Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of International Perioperative Care Protocols and Practices in 26 Countries
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2021
Abstract:
Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a global surge in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, some of whom may benefit from tracheostomy. Decisions on if, when, and how to perform tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 have major implications for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. We investigated the tracheostomy protocols and practices that institutions around the world have put into place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data Sources: Protocols for tracheostomy in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from individual institutions (n = 59) were obtained from the United States and 25 other countries, including data from several low- and middle-income countries, 23 published or society-endorsed protocols, and 36 institutional protocols. Review Methods: The comparative document analysis involved cross-sectional review of institutional protocols and practices. Data sources were analyzed for timing of tracheostomy, contraindications, preoperative testing, personal protective equipment (PPE), surgical technique, and postoperative management. Conclusions: Timing of tracheostomy varied from 3 to >21 days, with over 90% of protocols recommending 14 days of intubation prior to tracheostomy. Most protocols advocate delaying tracheostomy until COVID-19 testing was negative. All protocols involved use of N95 or higher PPE. Both open and percutaneous techniques were reported. Timing of tracheostomy changes ranged from 5 to >30 days postoperatively, sometimes contingent on negative COVID-19 test results. Implications for Practice: Wide variation exists in tracheostomy protocols, reflecting geographical variation, different resource constraints, and limited data to drive evidence-based care standards. Findings presented herein may provide reference points and a framework for evolving care standards.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
aerosol generating procedure; AGP; COVID-19; ethics; health care workers; infectivity; intensive care; intensive care unit; novel coronavirus; pandemic; patient safety; quality improvement; SARS-CoV-2; timing; tracheostomy; tracheotomy; ventilator; weaning
Elenco autori:
Bier-Laning, C.; Cramer, J. D.; Roy, S.; Palmieri, P. A.; Amin, A.; Anon, J. M.; Bonilla-Asalde, C. A.; Bradley, P. J.; Chaturvedi, P.; Cognetti, D. M.; Dias, F.; Di Stadio, A.; Fagan, J. J.; Feller-Kopman, D. J.; Hao, S. -P.; Kim, K. H.; Koivunen, P.; Loh, W. S.; Mansour, J.; Naunheim, M. R.; Schultz, M. J.; Shang, Y.; Sirjani, D. B.; S, T. John M. A.; Tay, J. K.; Vergez, S.; Weinreich, H. M.; Wong, E. W. Y.; Zenk, J.; Rassekh, C. H.; Brenner, M. J.
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: