Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNILINK
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations

UNI-FIND
Logo UNILINK

|

UNI-FIND

unilink.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  1. Outputs

Microscopy methods for biofilm imaging: focus on SEM and VP-SEM pros and cons

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2021
abstract:
Several imaging methodologies have been used in biofilm studies, contributing to deep- ening the knowledge on their structure. This review illustrates the most widely used microscopy techniques in biofilm investigations, focusing on traditional and innovative scanning electron mi- croscopy techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), variable pressure SEM (VP-SEM), environmental SEM (ESEM), and the more recent ambiental SEM (ASEM), ending with the cutting edge Cryo-SEM and focused ion beam SEM (FIB SEM), highlighting the pros and cons of several methods with particular emphasis on conventional SEM and VP-SEM. As each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages, the choice of the most appropriate method must be done carefully, based on the specific aim of the study. The evaluation of the drug effects on biofilm requires imaging methods that show the most detailed ultrastructural features of the biofilm. In this kind of research, the use of scanning electron microscopy with customized protocols such as osmium tetroxide (OsO4), ruthenium red (RR), tannic acid (TA) staining, and ionic liquid (IL) treatment is unrivalled for its image quality, magnification, resolution, minimal sample loss, and actual sample structure preserva- tion. The combined use of innovative SEM protocols and 3-D image analysis software will allow for quantitative data from SEM images to be extracted; in this way, data from images of samples that have undergone different antibiofilm treatments can be compared.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
scanning electron microscopy; variable pressure scanning electron microscopy; biofilm
List of contributors:
Relucenti, Michela; Familiari, Giuseppe; Donfrancesco, Orlando; Taurino, Maurizio; Li, Xiaobo; Chen, Rui; Artini, Marco; Papa, Rosanna; Selan, Laura
Authors of the University:
DONFRANCESCO ORLANDO
Handle:
https://iris.unilink.it/handle/20.500.14085/18269
Published in:
BIOLOGY
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0