Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
The essay explores the consequences the existence of common principles in ADR
proceedings, and in particular in adjudicative ADR, which can supplement any limits
of sectoral laws and regulations. In such cases, the role played by the individual called
to settle the dispute may be extremely relevant: if, instead of applying the legal provisions
laid down by the lawmaker, he evaluates the interests of the parties and ponders
on their conduct, it may be possible to identify principles that shall regulate the action.
Such principles would also apply to very different areas. However, the consequential
and ambiguous concentration of the power to make the rule and the power to apply
the rule under the same person may lead to unpredictable decisions.
proceedings, and in particular in adjudicative ADR, which can supplement any limits
of sectoral laws and regulations. In such cases, the role played by the individual called
to settle the dispute may be extremely relevant: if, instead of applying the legal provisions
laid down by the lawmaker, he evaluates the interests of the parties and ponders
on their conduct, it may be possible to identify principles that shall regulate the action.
Such principles would also apply to very different areas. However, the consequential
and ambiguous concentration of the power to make the rule and the power to apply
the rule under the same person may lead to unpredictable decisions.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
common principles; ADR; sectoral laws
Elenco autori:
Proto, M
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: